MTV et la Commission ensemble pour l'Europe. Et l'abstention ?
Aujourd'hui 30 avril à 15h30 des jeunes européens se sont réunis à Berlin, Milan et Prague pour crier « Ohé l’Europe, tu m’entends ? ».
De Lisbonne à Vilnius, des milliers de jeunes se sont joints à eux dans
les parcs et sur les places, à leurs fenêtres ou via leur webcam afin
de pousser un des plus grands cris jamais entendus.
I do like to read your on-line magazine. However, it appears your articles reflect opinions that are leaning on the failed European style of government that we all know too well - institutionalised, bureaucratic and distant from the real world and people.
____________________________
In the French referundum, I voted "No" to that kind of Europe (as read in the "constitution" paper) although I consider myself an internationalist with regards to social, cultural and political progress. Sarkozy backed-up by most media organization (including yours) disregarded people's opinion through passing the "constitution" anyway, renamed the Lisbon treaty. And you keep calling it a democratic process!
The same outcome is now happening in Ireland where the people's choice is not getting enough credit.
____________________________
Many people in France, Ireland, the Netherlands and in other countries are skeptical of this kind of European style of government. They do not want that supra national European governing style, its institutions, technocratic - and over paid - MEPs asking to be elected only to get a good job for themselves. Moreover, you do not give a voice to the people who put a "No" in the ballot box. You are not critical enough of this European type of government, probably because you are bias since European institutions and like-minded oraganisations are sponsoring the existence of your media. You can't be objective and critical because you owe them a voice in return for their sponsorship. They (= the European institutions and other like-minded organisations) OWN you, hence, you cannot be independant as a media.
____________________________
Is "cafe babel.com" the "Pravda" of European institutions ? For instance, why do you act as "pushers" for people to vote in June 2009 elections instead of asking them to think critically over the kind of Europe they want. Are you scared to find out that it might not be this one ?
I do like to read your on-line magazine. However, it appears your articles reflect opinions that are leaning on the failed European style of government that we all know too well - institutionalised, bureaucratic and distant from the real world and people.
____________________________
In the French referundum, I voted "No" to that kind of Europe (as read in the "constitution" paper) although I consider myself an internationalist with regards to social, cultural and political progress. Sarkozy backed-up by most media organization (including yours) disregarded people's opinion through passing the "constitution" anyway, renamed the Lisbon treaty. And you keep calling it a democratic process!
The same outcome is now happening in Ireland where the people's choice is not getting enough credit.
____________________________
Many people in France, Ireland, the Netherlands and in other countries are skeptical of this kind of European style of government. They do not want that supra national European governing style, its institutions, technocratic - and over paid - MEPs asking to be elected only to get a good job for themselves. Moreover, you do not give a voice to the people who put a "No" in the ballot box. You are not critical enough of this European type of government, probably because you are bias since European institutions and like-minded oraganisations are sponsoring the existence of your media. You can't be objective and critical because you owe them a voice in return for their sponsorship. They (= the European institutions and other like-minded organisations) OWN you, hence, you cannot be independant as a media.
____________________________
Is "cafe babel.com" the "Pravda" of European institutions ? For instance, why do you act as "pushers" for people to vote in June 2009 elections instead of asking them to think critically over the kind of Europe they want. Are you scared to find out that it might not be this one ?
Ils sont les fils du programme Erasmus, de l'Interrail et des voyages low-cost. Ils adorent la diversité mais ils cultivent leurs racines. Ils parlent (ou disent de parler) une ou plusieurs langues... Et – non ! – "étrangères" ne rentre pas dans leur vocabulaire. Ils ont déjà parlé au lit une langue qui n'était pas la leur. Pour se faire comprendre. Ou pour se la jouer. Ils ont reçu leur premier salaire en euro. Ils voyagent sans passeport. Et ils veulent discuter, rêver et dialoguer avec les autres européens. De l'Europe qu'ils veulent. De l'Europe qu'ils sont en train de construire. On the ground. C'est cette Europe, celle de la première eurogeneration, que ce blog veut raconter. Avec Alessandro qui traduit en français, Elisa en anglais et Laura en allemand. Et avec vous qui en faîtes partie.
Ce blog n'est plus actif. Si vous voulez savoir qu'est devenu Adriano Farano, jetez un oeil à http://adriano.farano.com
Commentaires
The European Pravda
I do like to read your on-line magazine. However, it appears your articles reflect opinions that are leaning on the failed European style of government that we all know too well - institutionalised, bureaucratic and distant from the real world and people.
____________________________
In the French referundum, I voted "No" to that kind of Europe (as read in the "constitution" paper) although I consider myself an internationalist with regards to social, cultural and political progress. Sarkozy backed-up by most media organization (including yours) disregarded people's opinion through passing the "constitution" anyway, renamed the Lisbon treaty. And you keep calling it a democratic process!
The same outcome is now happening in Ireland where the people's choice is not getting enough credit.
____________________________
Many people in France, Ireland, the Netherlands and in other countries are skeptical of this kind of European style of government. They do not want that supra national European governing style, its institutions, technocratic - and over paid - MEPs asking to be elected only to get a good job for themselves. Moreover, you do not give a voice to the people who put a "No" in the ballot box. You are not critical enough of this European type of government, probably because you are bias since European institutions and like-minded oraganisations are sponsoring the existence of your media. You can't be objective and critical because you owe them a voice in return for their sponsorship. They (= the European institutions and other like-minded organisations) OWN you, hence, you cannot be independant as a media.
____________________________
Is "cafe babel.com" the "Pravda" of European institutions ? For instance, why do you act as "pushers" for people to vote in June 2009 elections instead of asking them to think critically over the kind of Europe they want. Are you scared to find out that it might not be this one ?
The European Pravda
I do like to read your on-line magazine. However, it appears your articles reflect opinions that are leaning on the failed European style of government that we all know too well - institutionalised, bureaucratic and distant from the real world and people.
____________________________
In the French referundum, I voted "No" to that kind of Europe (as read in the "constitution" paper) although I consider myself an internationalist with regards to social, cultural and political progress. Sarkozy backed-up by most media organization (including yours) disregarded people's opinion through passing the "constitution" anyway, renamed the Lisbon treaty. And you keep calling it a democratic process!
The same outcome is now happening in Ireland where the people's choice is not getting enough credit.
____________________________
Many people in France, Ireland, the Netherlands and in other countries are skeptical of this kind of European style of government. They do not want that supra national European governing style, its institutions, technocratic - and over paid - MEPs asking to be elected only to get a good job for themselves. Moreover, you do not give a voice to the people who put a "No" in the ballot box. You are not critical enough of this European type of government, probably because you are bias since European institutions and like-minded oraganisations are sponsoring the existence of your media. You can't be objective and critical because you owe them a voice in return for their sponsorship. They (= the European institutions and other like-minded organisations) OWN you, hence, you cannot be independant as a media.
____________________________
Is "cafe babel.com" the "Pravda" of European institutions ? For instance, why do you act as "pushers" for people to vote in June 2009 elections instead of asking them to think critically over the kind of Europe they want. Are you scared to find out that it might not be this one ?